Re:High-speed rail taking shape even as opponents seek to ki...
by erentz on Sunday February 12, 2017 @08:36PM
(#13632474)
Correct. A difference is they start by thinking of (and running) the rail network as a whole system of supporting lines. Then add high speed railway segments to the network like expressways along key routes. This is what I think CA should do/have done. It's not too late actually, they could set up a "Caltrak". Develop a state wide rail plan that covered everything but urban metros, and begin buying assets/access and merging them into one whole network. What the CAHSR is building could continue, maybe with some adaptations of that plan, to just be those "expressway" sections mentioned.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:High-speed rail taking shape even as opponents seek to ki...
by gozur88 on Monday February 13, 2017 @07:39PM
(#13640252)
This. I know HSR is sexy, but for the money California should put in a conventional rail network first. People would take the train between San Francisco and LA, say, if speeds were comparable to driving.