Handful of “highly toxic” Wikipedia editors cause 9% of abuse

Re:Handful of “highly toxic” Wikipedia editors cause 9% of a... by hackuser on Saturday February 11, 2017 @06:23PM (#13625475)

Surely there must be some significant differences? It's hard to believe they are all the same. Claiming they are all the same is a strategy of propagandists (I'm not saying you are one; I'm saying it's a dubious approach). 'It's all the same' is the opposite of truth and accuracy, which require discernment; it the justification of liars (again, not the parent).

Anyway, the parent's claim isn't my experience, but now we're just one person on the Internet disagreeing with another.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Handful of “highly toxic” Wikipedia editors cause 9% of a... by jessriedel on Saturday February 11, 2017 @06:29PM (#13625504)

I'm not saying their all the same. I'm saying Wikipedia is generally better (though of course far from perfect), without trying to make difficult-to-quantify claims about how much better.

[ Parent | on HN ]