The Anti-Hero of CSS Layout – “display:table” (2014)

Re:The Anti-Hero of CSS Layout – “display:table” (2014) by luhn on Saturday February 11, 2017 @05:21PM (#13625188)

> It is fascinating how a perfectly sensible rule-of-thumb "you shouldn't use html tables for something which is not semantically a table" gradually morphed into various superstitions like "you shouldn't use html tables" or "you shouldn't use tables for layout" or even "you shouldn't use tables".

It's always bugged me to see the great lengths people will go to to avoid using an HTML table to create things like a calendar. A calendar is a table! Save yourself the effort and use <table>. It's not only easier, it's semantically correct as well.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Anti-Hero of CSS Layout – “display:table” (2014) by olavk on Sunday February 12, 2017 @07:58AM (#13628129)

I think many people is confused by "semantically a table" because they think of a table as a certain visual representation of data, which also how the word is often used.

The semantic definition of table in HTML is a bit more subtle - it is a set of data structured in two dimensions. (Like how the days in a monthly calendar is grouped by week (horizontally) and by day-of-week (vertically)).

[ Parent | on HN ]