Re:Handful of “highly toxic” Wikipedia editors cause 9% of a...
by Larrikin on Saturday February 11, 2017 @02:32PM
(#13624278)
I think all articles should be at formers level since people with a deeper knowledge will be using sites, books, etc where that deeper knowledge is assumed. If they aren't already they can get started by reading reading the sources in the article
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Handful of “highly toxic” Wikipedia editors cause 9% of a...
by noobermin on Saturday February 11, 2017 @06:55PM
(#13625642)
It is an encyclopedia, not a collection of tutorials. That seems more appropriate for something like wikibooks. Otherwise, every single article would be in inordinately long with a lot of redundancy. I like it better in which pre-requisites are often linked to other pages, so you can brush up on the pre-req's if you don't understand them.
Re:Handful of “highly toxic” Wikipedia editors cause 9% of a...
by throwaway2048 on Saturday February 11, 2017 @08:11PM
(#13625963)
wikipedia is a reference, reference material isnt teaching material.