News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Handful of “highly toxic” Wikipedia editors cause 9% of a... by sowbug on Saturday February 11, 2017 @02:12PM (#13624175)
This is a rare opportunity to cite the Gell-Mann Amnesia Effect: "You open the newspaper to an article on some subject you know well. In Murray [Gell-Mann]'s case, physics. In mine, show business. You read the article and see the journalist has absolutely no understanding of either the facts or the issues. Often, the article is so wrong it actually presents the story backward—reversing cause and effect. I call these the 'wet streets cause rain' stories. Paper's full of them. In any case, you read with exasperation or amusement the multiple errors in a story, and then turn the page to national or international affairs, and read as if the rest of the newspaper was somehow more accurate about Palestine than the baloney you just read. You turn the page, and forget what you know."

http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/65213-briefly-stated-the-gel...

Re:Handful of “highly toxic” Wikipedia editors cause 9% of a... by Deimorz on Saturday February 11, 2017 @11:05PM (#13626639)
There's a similar saying referred to as Knoll's Law of Media Accuracy: "Everything you read in the newspapers is absolutely true except for the rare story of which you happen to have firsthand knowledge."

There's also another related topic on TVTropes: http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/CowboyBebopAtHisC...

Re:Handful of “highly toxic” Wikipedia editors cause 9% of a... by blubb-fish on Saturday February 11, 2017 @02:22PM (#13624230)
I'm shocked - there is no Wikipedia article on this!
Re:Handful of “highly toxic” Wikipedia editors cause 9% of a... by psyc on Saturday February 11, 2017 @09:35PM (#13626313)
I've been pointing this out about journalism for years, and it's awesome that it has a name. However, I still want a name for just the first part of the effect - the part where you notice an article about your area of expertise is laughably wrong. And you never forget it and conclude that journalism is just terrible.