Re:RethinkDB versus PostgreSQL: my personal experience
by unixhero on Friday February 10, 2017 @02:04AM
(#13613747)
Hours is okay, if it works.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:RethinkDB versus PostgreSQL: my personal experience
by sgift on Friday February 10, 2017 @02:30AM
(#13613828)
Now, if you could just tell this to the people who depend on the software and tell me that hours of down time is not a possibility.
Re:RethinkDB versus PostgreSQL: my personal experience
by MarHoff on Friday February 10, 2017 @03:37AM
(#13614057)
Hours of work <> Hours of downtime
The bigger the database the more complex it will be to implement schema change while keeping track of transactions that happen while your are transitioning. However I see no reason why it shouldn't be feasible given proper amount of preparation. And if short downtime is a goal I don't see why a proper amount of time developing a solution wouldn't make it either.
And on top of that PostgreSQL community is implementing new way to solve problem with each release. I'm not in a huge live-data use case so I might be wrong, but upcoming logical replication look promising for such use cases https://www.depesz.com/2017/02/07/waiting-for-postgresql-10-....