Re:Regex: badly needs fuzzing
by civility on Thursday February 09, 2017 @08:32PM
(#13612602)
> Yes, I guessed (correctly!) that others would inquire about the rest of the comment
Fair enough.
> Your argument is something along the lines "a lot of code doesn't have particularly high security requirements" and "sandboxing/airgapping mitigates problems"
Nah, you're mixing up separate posts, but it doesn't really matter. I didn't start out with any intention of making an argument. I'm just tired of the "ZOMG! RCE!" sentiment as though that's the most important thing for everyone.
> [marketing, pain points, roadmap] was extensively discussed a few weeks ago
Fair enough.
> Your argument is something along the lines "a lot of code doesn't have particularly high security requirements" and "sandboxing/airgapping mitigates problems"
Nah, you're mixing up separate posts, but it doesn't really matter. I didn't start out with any intention of making an argument. I'm just tired of the "ZOMG! RCE!" sentiment as though that's the most important thing for everyone.
> [marketing, pain points, roadmap] was extensively discussed a few weeks ago
Yes, I've read those blog and forum posts.