News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on RethinkDB versus PostgreSQL: my personal experience. Parent comment

Re:RethinkDB versus PostgreSQL: my personal experience by threeseed on Thursday February 09, 2017 @06:48PM (#13612115)
In almost all cases I've seen the schema is simply in the application layer as opposed to the database layer.

The argument for schemas within databases was when you had dozens of users and applications all connected to a database. In the last few years we've seen micro services, Kafka queues and REST APIs replace the database as the primary integration points.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:RethinkDB versus PostgreSQL: my personal experience by 67726e on Thursday February 09, 2017 @11:38PM (#13613259)
Your schema might sit in code, but you've got to reinvent the wheel on all sorts of validations and guarantees your database would provide. Whether you have queues and APIs is irrelevant, your persistent store should be a strong one.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:RethinkDB versus PostgreSQL: my personal experience by throwaway91111 on Thursday February 09, 2017 @08:05PM (#13612506)
What sort of tooling does rethinkdb have for verifying the schema of existing data and inserts?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:RethinkDB versus PostgreSQL: my personal experience by SamReidHughes on Friday February 10, 2017 @01:57PM (#13617895)
Soon, write hooks. Not the greatest solution though.
[ Parent | on HN ]