News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Derrida vs. the rationalists by usgroup on Thursday February 09, 2017 @02:38PM (#13610134)
Pain ...

Studied analytical Phil at Undergrad and struggled with what's well captured in this joke:

"To do maths you need pen, paper and a wastebasket. For philosophy, the pen and paper are enough."

There's just so much noise, even in it's supposedly distilled analytical form. The stuff worth a damn e.g ontology, possible world semantics, epistemological logic, etc quickly finds its way out into another field.

It's there, the value is there, it's just all that damned noise is too.

Re:Derrida vs. the rationalists by crucialfelix on Thursday February 09, 2017 @03:26PM (#13610586)
Noise is just music that hasn't yet been understood, codified and eventually commodified.

(I'm joking, but not entirely)

Re:Derrida vs. the rationalists by splawn on Thursday February 09, 2017 @03:30PM (#13610638)
Noise is a sub-genere of music. (I'm serious, but not entirely)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noise_music

Re:Derrida vs. the rationalists by crucialfelix on Saturday February 11, 2017 @06:51PM (#13625626)
It's also the name of a very influential book on the subject: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noise:_The_Political_Economy_o...