Why is this job not handled by a machine yet?

Re:Why is this job not handled by a machine yet? by Lambdanaut on Thursday February 09, 2017 @11:43AM (#13608257)

That sort of thought has interesting philosophical implementations. You're positing that when our creations interact with others, we are unconsciously the ones interacting with others.

To a deeper extent, when you create and then raise a child, and your child grows up and interacts with others, that is also a case of you unconsciously interacting with others.

Follow the chain of creative identity backwards in time to the beginning, and you end up with the cause of the universe, whatever that may be, unconsciously interacting with itself, through everyone and everything.

It's not very relevant, and perhaps not even important, but it's an interesting perspective :)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why is this job not handled by a machine yet? by notduncansmith on Thursday February 09, 2017 @05:15PM (#13611535)

Through our eyes, the universe is perceiving itself. Through our ears, the universe is listening to its harmonies. We are the witnesses through which the universe becomes conscious of its glory, of its magnificence.

- Alan Watts

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why is this job not handled by a machine yet? by dwaltrip on Thursday February 09, 2017 @06:38PM (#13612071)

I would imagine that fewer causal links would indicate higher relevancy. That is to say, chains of different length shouldn't always be considered the same.

[ Parent | on HN ]