Re:New GM Cruise Self-Driving Video Shows More Mastery of SF...
by bluehawk on Thursday February 09, 2017 @12:39AM
(#13604927)
That's a bold assumption about his accidents being his fault. Maybe he was rear ended at a light when fully stopped. And even if he was going slower than traffic, it's still the other driver's job not to hit other cars.
Re:New GM Cruise Self-Driving Video Shows More Mastery of SF...
by freehunter on Thursday February 09, 2017 @09:37AM
(#13607166)
The first time I got rear-ended I was coming to a stop at a red light, the second time I was in the left-turn lane and came to a complete stop at the blinking red light. At no time was there any "flow of traffic" to speak of. The only way I caused those accidents was by not zooming through the light that was changing to red and not driving into the middle of the intersection on a blinking red light.
It's not my fault other drivers don't expect me to follow the law.
Re:New GM Cruise Self-Driving Video Shows More Mastery of SF...
by Buge on Thursday February 09, 2017 @01:55AM
(#13605187)
It's possible to increase accidents and save lives at the same time. If the average speed of accidents is greatly reduced, that could save lives.
[dead]
Re:New GM Cruise Self-Driving Video Shows More Mastery of SF...
by sctb on Thursday February 09, 2017 @06:27PM
(#13612024)
We've already asked you many times to stop breaking the guidelines, so we've banned this account. We're happy to unban accounts if you email us at [email protected] and commit to only posting civilly and substantively in the future.
Wait, so you already saw someone be seriously injured, and since then, you've caused two other accidents (which are a danger to you too), and you're still going with "I'll drive the speed limit and not drive with the flow of traffic?"
smh
Drive with the flow of traffic: save lives.