News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:More on GVFS by louhike on Wednesday February 08, 2017 @06:19AM (#13597415)
Will it still be the case next? I'm not saying it is a good choice, but maybe they consider they will gain enough traction to surpass it in the results.
Re:More on GVFS by scbrg on Wednesday February 08, 2017 @10:36AM (#13599013)
If that's the idea, that would make the choice of name directly malicious, rather than just an unfortunate oversight. I don't see how it would make qarioz's original point any less valid at all.
Re:More on GVFS by stuaxo on Wednesday February 08, 2017 @09:14AM (#13598311)
Which ends up being crappy for anyone on the gnome side googling for gvfs.