Goldman Sachs automated trading replaces 600 traders with 200 engineers

Re:Goldman Sachs automated trading replaces 600 traders with... by abstractbeliefs on Wednesday February 08, 2017 @12:46AM (#13596108)

The thing is, when you have 4 radiologists reading 100 scans each, if flagging and highlighting and generally improving performance of these personnel leads to two of them being able to process 200 scans each, the other two are out of a job.

They have been, de facto, replaced by computers, even if the job role still exists.

It's easier to see this if you break down the work not into images but into human-image-minutes. If there are 100 minutes of work, but you can assign the computer 50 of them which it can complete in seconds, the same number of human-image-minutes can be completed as before, but the computer has now taken them away from a human.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Goldman Sachs automated trading replaces 600 traders with... by fauigerzigerk on Wednesday February 08, 2017 @06:07AM (#13597375)

Unless the productivity gain is spent on doing more imaging. I think this aspect is underapreciated in many debates about automation, especially in health care. There is an insatiable demand for diagnostics for early detection of diseases or monitoring progression.

[ Parent | on HN ]