Re:Goldman Sachs automated trading replaces 600 traders with...
by RangerScience on Tuesday February 07, 2017 @05:14PM
(#13593424)
So... if 600 traders were replaced with 200 engineers, do the engineers make 2-3x the salary of the replaced traders?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Goldman Sachs automated trading replaces 600 traders with...
by sake on Tuesday February 07, 2017 @05:30PM
(#13593544)
Capitalist makes profit by minimizing worker's pay in relation to the value the work produces.
(But if it makes you sleep your nights better the answer is yes!)
Re:Goldman Sachs automated trading replaces 600 traders with...
by FT_intern on Tuesday February 07, 2017 @06:17PM
(#13593948)
No, engineers are not paid well at Goldman
Re:Goldman Sachs automated trading replaces 600 traders with...
by RangerScience on Tuesday February 07, 2017 @06:21PM
(#13593979)
So... There was another post up not to long ago about a programmer's union. The comments critiqued the need for it, but were talking generally.
Is there an opportunity for a financial programmer's union, so that the value those engineers bring is better shared with the people bringing them?