News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Ocean fish could disappear in 40 years . Parent comment

Re:Ocean fish could disappear in 40 years by j_baker on Tuesday May 18, 2010 @04:19PM (#1358898)
"As a result, a fleet of Royal Naval warships and tug-boats were employed to act as a deterrent against any future harassment of British fishing crews by the Icelandic craft. The conflict involved several cases of vessels ramming each other."

Was that all it took to have a conflict classified as a war back then?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Ocean fish could disappear in 40 years by jacquesm on Wednesday May 19, 2010 @02:05PM (#1361781)
It was a definite case of Great Britain stepping way over its bounds as a nation and bullying a much smaller nation with a navy of much smaller proportions over a resource the British themselves had destroyed around their home Island.

Very bad episode, and really reflecting bad on the security council as well, which should have stepped in. Of course th e British had considerable clout politically as well.

If it hadn't been for that NATO base who knows what would have happened.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Ocean fish could disappear in 40 years by hga on Tuesday May 18, 2010 @04:33PM (#1358941)
It was a conflict that was prosecuted by force instead of at negotiation tables, I think that'll suffice for the word "War". There was certainly a lot of treasure expended, if not blood.
[ Parent | on HN ]