News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Fruit and vegetable intake and the risk of overall cancer... by griffinmmahon on Sunday February 05, 2017 @08:02PM (#13575761)
OJ is just sugar water though, the value of fruit is (I think) the whole fruit.
Re:Fruit and vegetable intake and the risk of overall cancer... by autokad on Sunday February 05, 2017 @08:07PM (#13575780)
true, but i have an even stronger alergic reaction to the fruit :)

its also worth noting that fruit is sugar water. its 98-99% water + 2% sugar and fiber

Re:Fruit and vegetable intake and the risk of overall cancer... by dxhdr on Sunday February 05, 2017 @09:09PM (#13576046)
> its also worth noting that fruit is sugar water. its 98-99% water + 2% sugar and fiber

Oranges, apples, etc are only 85% water. Grapes 80%. The rest is fiber and is likely why your body tells you to stop eating them. Two and a half apples is a lot less appealing than a can of soda (actual sugar water).

The whole percent water thing is completely meaningless though, human brains are 85% water and babies are 80%.

Re:Fruit and vegetable intake and the risk of overall cancer... by scythe on Sunday February 05, 2017 @10:57PM (#13576380)
The proportion of water is certainly not meaningless when considering the expected caloric intake of a food administered ad libitum. Satiety is partially controlled by stretch receptors in the gut lining and common sense will tell you it's much harder to consume the same amount of calories from a 2g/100mL sugar solution as from a 10g/100mL solution.
Re:Fruit and vegetable intake and the risk of overall cancer... by autokad on Sunday February 05, 2017 @11:07PM (#13576411)
ah, i grossly over estimated the % water in those fruits. interestingly though, fruit juices fall in the 80-90% range I just read.
Re:Fruit and vegetable intake and the risk of overall cancer... by griffinmmahon on Sunday February 05, 2017 @08:13PM (#13575807)
Hm. I've heard lots of different angles on not eating fruit but never got these numbers. Thanks!
Re:Fruit and vegetable intake and the risk of overall cancer... by vixen99 on Monday February 06, 2017 @04:11AM (#13577812)
And the sugar is the wrong one - fructose which is metabolized mainly by the liver whereas glucose is used by all cells in the body.
Re:Fruit and vegetable intake and the risk of overall cancer... by flukus on Monday February 06, 2017 @12:02AM (#13576627)
What about the ones that include the pulp?
Re:Fruit and vegetable intake and the risk of overall cancer... by lingben on Monday February 06, 2017 @12:19AM (#13576700)
the ones with pulp are still providing you with a massive amount of sugar relative to pulp

you can easily drink the equivalent of 12 oranges, in one drink but very very few people can eat 12 oranges in one sitting

there is wisdom in that nature packages sugar with fibre, at times lots and lots of fibre (cane sugar for example)

Re:Fruit and vegetable intake and the risk of overall cancer... by flukus on Monday February 06, 2017 @12:44AM (#13576823)
Cane sugars good and/or not too bad? We used to munch on that as kids, although more often than not we just sucked on it, so probably not so good.
Re:Fruit and vegetable intake and the risk of overall cancer... by tomhoward on Monday February 06, 2017 @08:52AM (#13579381)
Sucked from cane is not too bad; in that form it has a lot of other nutrients that make it easier for the body to handle.

When it's refined into crystals, is when it does more damage, particularly when consumed to excess.

Re:Fruit and vegetable intake and the risk of overall cancer... by vixen99 on Monday February 06, 2017 @04:13AM (#13577825)
No difference chemically between cane sugar and sugar from beet. It's sucrose i.e., glucose and fructose joined together.