Re:Introducing PureScript Erlang back end
by dualogy on Thursday February 02, 2017 @06:57PM
(#13556273)
> Could PureScript become a more viable and practical Haskell?
Probably depends on the reasons why anyone might perceive Haskell as sub-viable or sub-practical in the first place (other than for transpiling to other languages with possibly "less FP" paradigms) --- I for one would be curious to hear them!
Probably depends on the reasons why anyone might perceive Haskell as sub-viable or sub-practical in the first place (other than for transpiling to other languages with possibly "less FP" paradigms) --- I for one would be curious to hear them!