Re:Snap Inc. S-1
by adtac on Thursday February 02, 2017 @05:40PM
(#13555613)
May I ask why? What would companies get out of doing that?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Snap Inc. S-1
by ProblemFactory on Thursday February 02, 2017 @05:53PM
(#13555732)
There are a lot of laws and regulations around advertising stock for sale to the general public (as opposed to qualified private investors).
Companies have to be very conservative but thorough in the "Risk Factors" section, or get sued by investors claiming to have been misled later.
For example some of Google's Risk Factors from 2004:
> New technologies could block our ads, which would harm our business.
> We generate our revenue almost entirely from advertising, and the reduction in spending by or loss of advertisers could seriously harm our business.
> We are susceptible to index spammers who could harm the integrity of our web search results.
Re:Snap Inc. S-1
by twinkletwinkle on Thursday February 02, 2017 @05:45PM
(#13555667)
I imagine it's a legal disclaimer. Same reason every investing prospectus in existence says "Past performance is not a guarantee of future returns"
Are there legal implications if you use language like "we _hope_ to get to a profitable stage within one year"?
It's more that there are no upsides (saying "hope to" doesn't sound very certain, so no one is going to increase the price they'll pay for your IPO shares) and there are downsides if you don't become profitable within a year, once you've said you hope / intend to. So, the bottom-line incentives are not to say it.