News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Snap Inc. S-1 by brandon272 on Thursday February 02, 2017 @04:58PM (#13555149)
$400 million annually represents a monthly cost per user of $0.21 at 158 million daily active users. Which seems high at scale when looking at storage + bandwidth alone, I would think, but I'm also not a big Snapchat user so I'm not sure what is going on in terms of long term storage of video on an account level.
Re:Snap Inc. S-1 by hrrsn on Thursday February 02, 2017 @05:02PM (#13555191)
I would think their bandwidth costs are astronomical. Since 19/3/16 Snapchat has used 14.8GB of mobile data on my iPhone alone - not including WiFi.
Re:Snap Inc. S-1 by johansch on Thursday February 02, 2017 @05:10PM (#13555291)
Bandwidth is kinda cheap these days though, if you avoid GC and AWS. Anyone have recent numbers at this scale of commitment?
Re:Snap Inc. S-1 by sjg007 on Thursday February 02, 2017 @06:59PM (#13556293)
They will get a bulk discount so it will be cheap probably close to zero.
Re:Snap Inc. S-1 by omarchowdhury on Thursday February 02, 2017 @08:06PM (#13556735)
Close to zero but $400M in related expense.
Re:Snap Inc. S-1 by marcamillion on Friday February 03, 2017 @04:16AM (#13558712)
I literally lolled at this comment.

I assume this is sarcasm...just want to verify :)

Re:Snap Inc. S-1 by jonknee on Thursday February 02, 2017 @05:09PM (#13555276)
I would also assume they have factored in some growth over the next 5 years... If they don't have many multiples of 158M DAU by 2022 they are screwed regardless of their hosting bill.