He addressed it again in a blog post: http://blog.samaltman.com/the-2016-election
Why do they need to publicly admit the obvious? What is the angle here?
True. Nice observation.
> "You've described yourself as a liberal just not a Dem apologist. Can you please keep your origin story straight for the next 30 day"
I'm not sure what you mean by this...what is the "origin story" you speak of that you apparently know so much about? I haven't contradicted myself about it.
Seriously though, investment is a form of partnership. Thiel has diminished his stature as an investor in my eyes, government access or not; I will never -- now or in the future -- accept money from a Thiel-backed fund. YMMV.
[Edited to reflect a phrase I thought I was responding to, but was either misread or edited later...]
Actions speak louder than words: drop him or acknowledge that YC at some level acknowledges his views (this isn't bad, or good, just something that should be done in my view).
Even something as simple as "we acknowledge that people have differing political views, yadda yadda... would be sufficient).
Why say anything about him? Well, clearly he's the elephant in the room. They should acknowledge this and move on.