News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:John Carmack on expert witnesses and 'non literal' copying by MaxfordAndSons on Thursday February 02, 2017 @01:46PM (#13553225)
Is it possible he wanted to protect other proprietary code from being exposed in discovery? I guess he could have tried to explain that, but that might still have constituted an admission of guilt anyway.

There are no comments on this comment yet.