Re:John Carmack on expert witnesses and 'non literal' copying
by zamalek on Thursday February 02, 2017 @12:47PM
(#13552622)
Not to mention that the Zeni prototype was merely adequate, while the Oculus product is polished.
I think that ZeniMax are seriously salty about shoving off VR now that it's blossoming. That being said, working on company equipment during company time? Carmack screwed up.
Re:John Carmack on expert witnesses and 'non literal' copying
by justin66 on Thursday February 02, 2017 @01:32PM
(#13553096)
> That being said, working on company equipment during company time? Carmack screwed up.
I'm fairly sure Carmack saw his role as one of a researcher, such that working on VR and sharing knowledge with the outside was part of what he was being paid for. I'm not familiar with his contract but I remember his communications regarding VR at the time and that's the way it appeared.
Re:John Carmack on expert witnesses and 'non literal' copying
by jandrese on Thursday February 02, 2017 @04:38PM
(#13554932)
This argument I don't understand. Carmack was tasked with making a Doom demo for VR, so he did. Why it is such a shocker that he worked on a company project with company time is a mystery to me. He even pushed Zenimax to make a releasable version, but the upper management thought VR was a waste of time which is why he left.
If this was not legal, we would all be bound to the same employer for life. This could be extrapolated to virtually any employee. Have you assembled burgers for McDonald's before? If so, you can't work at Burger King, because they also make burgers and you have proprietary knowledge of McDonald's burgers.
I have spoken with numerous individuals who added support for specification X to one vendor's product, then did the same at the next job, so on and so forth. One individual had implemented the same specification for 3 different companies, all competitors, in just a few years. When you consider the breadth and depth of some specifications, the code doubtlessly is similar in form and obviously identical in function.