News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The .NET Language Strategy by WayneBro on Thursday February 02, 2017 @10:33AM (#13551171)
You don't write your type twice in C# either. So, the second example would be:

    var d = new Dictionary<string, string>();
`Dim` is worse than `var` because nobody uses the word "Dimension" when they're talking about variables.
Re:The .NET Language Strategy by cm2187 on Thursday February 02, 2017 @11:32AM (#13551789)
As I said, var was introduced with type inference. Before type inference you had to declare it twice, which you never had to do in VB, even in VB6.
Re:The .NET Language Strategy by WayneBro on Thursday February 02, 2017 @01:38PM (#13553150)
Right, but it was introduced to C# over 8 years ago so it's a bit of a moot point, wouldn't you say?

`Dim`, a poorly worded keyword by today's standards, is a perfect example of the kind of leftover crap that C# doesn't have today that VB still does have.

Re:The .NET Language Strategy by smoothdeveloper on Thursday February 02, 2017 @02:15PM (#13553547)
Try defining an instance member with var in C#