News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Uber seeks $7.75M settlement in California labor code cla... by falcolas on Thursday February 02, 2017 @09:51AM (#13550857)
> I think the idea that the government should protect people from their own choices is quite an unpleasant one

If the government doesn't protect people against immoral companies, who will? If an employee doesn't understand their obligations to pay extra taxes and cover their own forms of insurance, and doesn't ask for enough money up front to cover those costs, they'll go to jail and/or be bankrupt. That creates costs for taxpayers and corporations, the net loss likely higher than the cost of a bit of regulation and education.

Why not educate those employees (or ensure that they can't get stiffed for a lack of education) instead of allowing them to be funneled (or scammed) into an unproductive dead end? As a taxpayer, I'd rather see them protected and productive than unproductive and bankrupt.

Re:Uber seeks $7.75M settlement in California labor code cla... by beaconstudios on Thursday February 02, 2017 @12:25PM (#13552331)
I think the sticking point here is that you're talking from a viewpoint of companies pressuring employees to convert from full-time to contract. I don't know if that happens, and it's not the viewpoint I'm talking from - I don't think a company should be able to pressure an employee to do anything outside of their employment agreement and there certainly isn't legal grounds for them to be able to enforce something like that. Harming legitimate contractors in an attempt to solve this issue by proxy is illogical.