> isn't comparable to that dossier, which was (apparently) compiled from numerous in-person visits and interviews
And that (apparently) can trace its origins to a 4-chan prank?
That depends on whether you consider the word of an anonymous 4channer to be as reliable as that of a former intelligence officer.
Personally, I do not.
It's not so much the word, as the time-stamped posts from months before the news was published.
Any links? Last I checked those were pretty thoroughly debunked.
http://gizmodo.com/4chan-idiots-claim-they-invented-the-trum...
I agree with you broadly, though. To me, fake news has absolutely no mooring in reality whatsoever and is pure clickbait - usually without political motive beyond getting angry people to click.