News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Reuters' position on covering Trump by maxerickson on Wednesday February 01, 2017 @07:05PM (#13546736)
Are you talking about the firing of the acting Attorney General? Not a judge.

It wasn't really that big a deal, it was as much a political statement on her part as it was on the administration's. It's concerning, but it is unlikely to become part of a pattern, the top officials at the Justice Department will soon be appointees of the administration rather than people that agreed to carry out necessary functions during the transition.

Re:Reuters' position on covering Trump by astrodust on Wednesday February 01, 2017 @11:06PM (#13548030)
> ...it is unlikely to become part of a pattern...

And that's where we disagree. I think this is the first of many.