Re:The .NET Language Strategy
by fiddlerwoaroof on Wednesday February 01, 2017 @11:49PM
(#13548194)
I started with similar tools: Borland Delphi and the Object Pascal language.
Re:The .NET Language Strategy
by fiddlerwoaroof on Wednesday February 01, 2017 @11:53PM
(#13548216)
I'm not really sure of the timeline, but I think Delphi pioneered the "reusable components" paradigm and VB was Microsoft's entry into the market.
Delphi came after VB3. VB3 had "custom controls" called VBX (Visual Basic Extensions), which were the reusable components. It was the precursor to OCX and ActiveX controls.
Re:The .NET Language Strategy
by probablybroken on Thursday February 02, 2017 @08:44AM
(#13550412)
Yes - I migrated from VB -> Delphi - one of the big advantages at the time was you could compile a small executable that didn't require you to distribute several additional disks of vb runtime DLLs with your software.
Then the start up went bust and I was back to C++ before any newer version of VB came out. They really got reusable components right. I've never had an experience since where there is such a huge jump in productivity with a new technology.