Re:Reuters' position on covering Trump
by williamle8300 on Wednesday February 01, 2017 @04:19PM
(#13545326)
You may not consider 232 (CLINTON) -– 306 (TRUMP) a landslide but I certainly do.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Reuters' position on covering Trump
by dragonwriter on Wednesday February 01, 2017 @04:22PM
(#13545356)
If you do, you rob "landslide" of any substantive meaning -- virtually every Presidential election is a "landslide" by that standard, and Trump's is the fifth weakest in 100 years.