Reuters' position on covering Trump

Re:Reuters' position on covering Trump by peeters on Wednesday February 01, 2017 @04:09PM (#13545213)

I'm having trouble seeing where in your link there is any evidence presented that Obama's birth certificate is forged. It's an article about some guy saying it was forged.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Reuters' position on covering Trump by williamle8300 on Wednesday February 01, 2017 @04:15PM (#13545280)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=USoWpLll4Cg

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/04/29/expert-says-obama...

http://glitch.news/2016-12-29-real-forensic-investigation-de...

http://thedailybanter.com/2016/12/arpaio-proof-fake-birth-ce...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Reuters' position on covering Trump by ugh22 on Wednesday February 01, 2017 @05:49PM (#13546199)

Your evidence is Arpaio? lol.

I guess the newspaper announcement was faked 60 years ago too?

Seriously dude, drop it. It's pathetic and sad. Hundreds of experts have looked at it, of course there is 1 racist goon who will say otherwise.

[ Parent | on HN ]