News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Reuters' position on covering Trump by ams6110 on Wednesday February 01, 2017 @04:01PM (#13545123)
Though if you read Art of the Deal or have studied how Trump operates, his initial position on anything is always more than he wants. So they "backpedaled" on green cards and legal visas and still have what they really wanted.
Re:Reuters' position on covering Trump by klipt on Wednesday February 01, 2017 @04:25PM (#13545376)
Yes I know about "talk past the deal".

But that's not how democratic leaders are meant to act, that's how dictators act.

I feel like America is selling its birthright - a democratic republic - for the illusion of security. It's been happening ever since 9/11 but now it's even worse.

Re:Reuters' position on covering Trump by smsm42 on Wednesday February 01, 2017 @08:46PM (#13547343)
No, that's not how dictators act. How dictators act is they do what they want and if you resisted, they put you in jail or kill you. Dictators don't need negotiating tactics because negotiation is part of democratic process which requires consensus. Dictators don't negotiate, they dictate.
Re:Reuters' position on covering Trump by klipt on Thursday February 02, 2017 @07:42PM (#13556581)
Consensus ... crowd pleasing ... dictators can do that. The hallmark of the dictator is their disrespect for individual rights, but you can totally please a crowd while stepping on individual rights, see Chavez:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2017/01/27/...

Re:Reuters' position on covering Trump by smsm42 on Friday February 03, 2017 @08:22PM (#13565000)
Consensus and crowd pleasing is not the same. And dictators aren't usually as good at pleasing the crowds as they think they are, otherwise there would be no need to suppress freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, freedom of elections, etc. which dictators (including Chavez, of course) routinely do.
Re:Reuters' position on covering Trump by jhanschoo on Thursday February 02, 2017 @06:44PM (#13556163)
Every time this book is mentioned, I feel obliged to add the caveat that it was ghostwritten (http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2016/07/25/donald-trumps-g...)
Re:Reuters' position on covering Trump by nikdaheratik on Wednesday February 01, 2017 @06:22PM (#13546465)
And if anyone running things in the Trump administration actually knew the law, or history, they'd understand that treating people equally no matter what country they came from is not negotiable. You can't run a government like a business deal.