Re:Tesla Motors, Inc. Is Now Officially Tesla, Inc
by avar on Wednesday February 01, 2017 @02:18PM
(#13543972)
Don't fully airtight structures need a lot of redundant safety systems to protect against just leaving a candle on killing everyone from carbon dioxide poisoning?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Tesla Motors, Inc. Is Now Officially Tesla, Inc
by Stefstefstef on Wednesday February 01, 2017 @03:16PM
(#13544651)
Airtight homes doesnt mean no ventilation but no cracks in walls and doors and window framing
Re:Tesla Motors, Inc. Is Now Officially Tesla, Inc
by maxerickson on Wednesday February 01, 2017 @03:49PM
(#13544981)
In the context of avar's question the active ventilation is a safety system.
A little bit of research indicates that candles are not all that different in oxygen consumption and CO2 production than a human and that a single candle (or person) wouldn't use up the oxygen quickly if the ventilation ceased.
As long as a failure of the ventilation system is obvious (so a window can be opened or whatever), it doesn't seem like it would be a major concern.
Re:Tesla Motors, Inc. Is Now Officially Tesla, Inc
by jasonwatkinspdx on Wednesday February 01, 2017 @10:54PM
(#13547967)
Well, a candle isn't enough to be a concern. But state of the art air tight passive houses include ventilator units that exchange air while retaining (or rejecting) as much heat as possible.