Reuters' position on covering Trump

Re:Reuters' position on covering Trump by JoshGlazebrook on Wednesday February 01, 2017 @01:42PM (#13543565)

Honestly I feel way overwhelmed by the administration related news and it has barely been over a week. It's also a constant reminder that oh yeah this really did happen and it continues to get worse.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Reuters' position on covering Trump by ApostleMatthew on Wednesday February 01, 2017 @01:43PM (#13543582)

I think the evolution of how the media operates over the next 4ish years will be very interesting to watch.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Reuters' position on covering Trump by camperman on Wednesday February 01, 2017 @02:37PM (#13544186)

This is entirely intentional. The God Emperor is overwhelming you with shock and awe to make opposition seem pointless, which it is of course.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Reuters' position on covering Trump by akvadrako on Wednesday February 01, 2017 @03:27PM (#13544753)

I don't know why you are downvoted, because it's clearly true. It's part of his playbook, The Art of the Deal. Scott Adams continues to be an annoying but fairly accurate narrator of the Trump narrative:

http://blog.dilbert.com/post/156399716951/outrage-dilution

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Reuters' position on covering Trump by camperman on Thursday February 02, 2017 @06:13AM (#13549681)

Yep. I'm downvoted because anything even remotely right is on here.

[ Parent | on HN ]