News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Were Early Modern People Perpetually Drunk? (2016) by gabemart on Wednesday February 01, 2017 @02:40AM (#13539088)
That's a real shame, they're ubiquitous in Scotland; any brand's "70 shilling" will be in the 3.5% range. Belhaven Best is also extremely common, and that's 3.2%.

It's common in England for pubs to have at least one bitter that is below 4%.

Re:Were Early Modern People Perpetually Drunk? (2016) by david-given on Wednesday February 01, 2017 @05:23AM (#13539653)
They're awesome, too. Tonnes of flavour, huge variety, thoroughly drinkable, and low enough in alcohol that you can usually get an extra pint in. There are what the USians call microbreweries everywhere and any decent pub is likely to have a local session beer, frequently very good.

I live in Zürich now. The local lager's okay, but it's all lager, and it's all 5%, which is the upper limit of what I like. I miss good old fashioned ale.

Re:Were Early Modern People Perpetually Drunk? (2016) by saiya-jin on Wednesday February 01, 2017 @08:41AM (#13540601)
if you mean stuff you can buy in shops like COOP, then local lager is piece of s__t. if you mean some local small breweries then it might be different
Re:Were Early Modern People Perpetually Drunk? (2016) by jacobush on Thursday February 02, 2017 @11:26AM (#13551728)
But ... try Falcon Bayersk and tell me you don't like it.
Re:Were Early Modern People Perpetually Drunk? (2016) by jacobush on Thursday February 02, 2017 @11:24AM (#13551707)
3.5% beers, if well made well, to my taste are better than the stronger ones of the same brand.