News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:AI Beats Four Top Poker Players by brilliantcode on Tuesday January 31, 2017 @05:07PM (#13535735)
probably not going to get any details out of you but worth trying: can you give any pointers to implement such strategies and the minimum capital involved?
Re:AI Beats Four Top Poker Players by xapata on Tuesday January 31, 2017 @06:45PM (#13536595)
A Google search result for "machine learning stock trading":

https://www.udacity.com/course/machine-learning-for-trading-...

Re:AI Beats Four Top Poker Players by brilliantcode on Tuesday January 31, 2017 @07:36PM (#13536965)
well to be honest I never bothered googling that exact term but I was more interested in the details around his deployment of smaller and successful neural networks as part of a portfolio.
Re:AI Beats Four Top Poker Players by deepnotderp on Tuesday January 31, 2017 @10:32PM (#13537986)
Basically, certain neural networks perform better at predicting different factors at different market conditions. You can string them together to get a decent trader, enough to make a profit, but not enough to justify hogging your GPUs.
Re:AI Beats Four Top Poker Players by BigJono on Wednesday February 01, 2017 @07:27AM (#13540160)
As in the profit generated isn't enough to sustain the electricity cost of running the GPUs? Are you able to scale up with more initial investment? How much did you invest and what kind of return on investment were you getting?
Re:AI Beats Four Top Poker Players by deepnotderp on Wednesday February 01, 2017 @10:13AM (#13541269)
Not enough to justify using up the compute capabilities of my GPUs since I need them for research.

I averaged a return of 7-13% a year. With less than 1000 in capital, it wasn't very profitable.

I don't see why it shouldn't scale.