News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by noonespecial on Sunday January 29, 2017 @08:16PM (#13517938)
Just the first ripples against the shore of what I expect to be a tsunami of unexpected consequences.

Seems like a golden opportunity for another country to step up and become the "conference center of the world". I'd LOL extra hard if it turned out to be Mexico.

Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by cperciva on Sunday January 29, 2017 @10:24PM (#13518415)
Seems like a golden opportunity for another country to step up and become the "conference center of the world". I'd LOL extra hard if it turned out to be Mexico.

Can I suggest Canada for this purpose? We're a cheaper conference destination than the USA, Europe, or Japan; have a fluently English-speaking population anywhere conferences would be held (most people in Montreal are bilingual); have good infrastructure; and most international visitors to the USA already fly over Canada anyway.

This would be unfortunate for conference attendees from Central and South America, but they're far outnumbered by the conference attendees from Europe and Asia.

Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by Symbiote on Monday January 30, 2017 @03:08AM (#13519389)
> already fly over Canada anyway

But holding conferences in Canada would leave many people with few good options, other than to transfer in the USA.

Transiting through an American airport requires a visa, and [1] had her transit visa cancelled last week, leaving her stranded in Costa Rica.

It was policy at my previous employer, which had lots of work in Central America and an international staff, to avoid transiting through Florida, and use Madrid or Panama instead. The hassle wasn't worth at most a minor saving in cost or time.

Southern Europe would be a cheaper location for conferences, with few visa issues, and is also a lot closer to Asia.

[1] http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-38786119

Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by cperciva on Monday January 30, 2017 @04:29AM (#13519671)
As I said, Canada is not ideal for people coming from Central or South America. But I can't think of any other starting point where you'd want to transit the USA rather than taking a direct flight to Canada.
Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by graeme on Monday January 30, 2017 @08:34AM (#13520967)
I've noticed a lot of flights from Montreal to Asia will transit through the US. So having to avoid the US probably increase some flight expense?

Of course if the US becomes even worse to transit through airlines will probably route around it.

Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by Theodores on Monday January 30, 2017 @03:10AM (#13519402)
Let the market decide. There are conferences and trade shows for everything and anything all the time, all over the world. Take your favourite programming thing, there may be some meet up in your local town, it may be just a couple of people, not exactly a 'conference'. You might not be able to go to the big conference in Las Vegas (or wherever) but the conference in Berlin (or wherever) might be the one to attend this year anyway.

There is money in conferences and, if the USA wants to make itself as attractive as North Korea for foreign visitors, then the 'second tier' conferences held elsewhere will become the more important events to attend for non-Americans.

I think this is progress in a way, too many industries have some big U.S. trade show event as the focal point of the year and it is a long way to go to get new customers from your own country/town.

Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by toothbrush on Monday January 30, 2017 @02:14AM (#13519217)
> This would be unfortunate for conference attendees from Central and South America, but they're far outnumbered by the conference attendees from Europe and Asia.

Then surely, somewhere in Europe or Asia or perhaps wherever the centre of mass of the conference participants happened to fall would be the cheapest destination? I, for one, do not live in the USA, so Canada would definitely not be cheaper than Europe to visit.

Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by cperciva on Monday January 30, 2017 @02:35AM (#13519296)
Maybe it's just a matter of which conferences I attend, but my impression is that "conference attendees per capita" is highest for the USA, lower for Europe, and much lower for Asia. If you want to be closest to people in general you'd probably aim for somewhere around Nepal (mind you, it doesn't have very good connectivity for air travel); but being closest to conference attendees is probably going to be between the USA, Europe, and Asia... in other words, Canada.

(As for the cost, when I said "cheaper" I meant in terms of the cost of conference facilities, food, and hotels. Obviously the cost of travel will depend on where someone is starting their trip.)

Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by jon-wood on Monday January 30, 2017 @02:45AM (#13519327)
How much of that is a product of it being much more expensive for someone from Asia to travel to US conferences? I'm in the often forgotten pool of people who can't just expense conference travel with their employer, and that means I don't even consider conferences outside Europe as they'll be prohibitively expensive.
Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by Symbiote on Monday January 30, 2017 @03:11AM (#13519405)
Asia is on the opposite side of the world from the USA. Their cost to attend is highest, when the conference is in the USA.

Check the distances on a globe -- "between the USA, Europe and Asia" is actually the Middle East. If we need to account for additional attendance from North America, then somewhere in Europe is better -- and the south or east cheaper than the north or west.

Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by cperciva on Monday January 30, 2017 @04:22AM (#13519636)
Check the distances on a globe -- "between the USA, Europe and Asia" is actually the Middle East

You sure about that? Let's take Denver, Frankfurt, and Hong Kong as representatives of USA, Europe, and Asia, since they're somewhat central to the regions and have major airports.

    DEN-YEG: 1019 miles
    FRA-YEG: 4559 miles
    HKG-YEG: 6504 miles
    Total distances to Edmonton: 12531 miles

    DEN-DXB: 7771 miles
    FRA-DXB: 3012 miles
    HKG-DXB: 3684 miles
    Total distances to Dubai: 14467 miles
The most "central" point between the USA, Europe, and Asia is actually pretty close to the North Pole: http://www.gcmap.com/mapui?P=FRA-DEN-HKG-FRA&MS=wls&MP=p&DU=...
Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by baursak on Monday January 30, 2017 @09:55AM (#13521619)
LOL @ Edmonton vs Dubai comparison.

A big chunk of Edmonton internatonal connections route through the US airports -- SEA, MSP, DEN, ORD, SFO, etc. Unless Edmonton airport becomes a major global air hub like Dubai, this is just plain laughable. The actual distance in miles is not the primary concern by far. Not to mention the sheer uncompetitiveness of Canadian airline industry and airports in general. Canada is the most expensive air destination in the world.

http://globalnews.ca/news/2931748/international-flights-from...

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/rob-commen...

Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by santaclaus on Monday January 30, 2017 @12:15AM (#13518878)
> We're a cheaper conference destination than the USA, Europe, or Japan

Errr, our field's major conf is in Vancouver every other year and those hotel rooms are crazy pants expensive.

Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by dmoy on Monday January 30, 2017 @01:54AM (#13519161)
OK everywhere except Vancouver is cheaper... Vancouver is special.
Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by briandear on Monday January 30, 2017 @05:58AM (#13520070)
Then you could say that Houston is cheaper than Toronto. This 'cheaper' argument is meaningless unless we say "cheaper than NYC or San Fran."
Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by Buge on Monday January 30, 2017 @01:25AM (#13519093)
Canada can require you to give up your phone password when entering. As far as I heard, the US does not require that (but can confiscate your phone). Is there possibly another country that doesn't require it?
Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by ctrl_freak on Monday January 30, 2017 @04:31AM (#13519683)
US CBP definitely can ask for your passcode/passwords. There was a post on HN last week about a guy who refused to turn over his passcode: https://vc.gg/blog/so-its-been-a-while.html
Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by Buge on Thursday February 02, 2017 @01:13AM (#13548514)
Yes, the US can ask for you password, but they can't require you to give up your password. If you don't give your password, they confiscate your device. In Canada, if you don't give your password they can charge you with a crime and you can spend up to a year in jail.
Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by twsted on Monday January 30, 2017 @02:00AM (#13519177)
Kidding? Ref please?
Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by Semaphor on Monday January 30, 2017 @02:34AM (#13519292)
http://www.cbc.ca/news/alain-philippon-phone-password-case-p...

For more sources google canada phone password. Tons of results.

Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by msie on Monday January 30, 2017 @03:58AM (#13519539)
There's this show about the Canadian border services and they regularly go through people's phones: 'Border Security'
Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by camus2 on Monday January 30, 2017 @06:57AM (#13520411)
And computers too, some French guy was caught with "anime porn" on his hard drive at the border, went to prison for a few month.
Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by iamatworknow on Monday January 30, 2017 @01:37PM (#13523795)
Canadian customs once searched my brother's laptop at the border, in his presence, and their method was as trivial as doing a Windows file search for "boy" and "girl".
Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by lazaroclapp on Monday January 30, 2017 @02:37AM (#13519304)
Well, Mexico and Chile also have visa free entry into Canada now, so it would actually be a net improvement for Latin American countries as well (and I see no reason, specially with the current government, that Canada could not eventually negotiate visa-free transit with Argentina and/or Brazil next)
Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by allengeorge on Monday January 30, 2017 @08:10AM (#13520797)
A strong "+1" to this. Plus, there are quite a few strong CS and engineering universities in Canada, so it's not as if the intellectual environment will have to be created from scratch.
Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by wattt on Sunday January 29, 2017 @11:19PM (#13518612)
Why do you think Canada wouldn't be as good for Central or South Americans? There are flights to Central and South America from almost everywhere in Canada. I speak Spanish in Canada often.
Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by cperciva on Sunday January 29, 2017 @11:38PM (#13518723)
Two reasons. First, flying to Canada is simply a longer flight. Second, the USA has some rules concerning passengers on flights in US airspace; it's possible that people who couldn't attend a conference in the USA wouldn't be allowed to fly over the USA either.
Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by psybin on Monday January 30, 2017 @12:48AM (#13518981)
They mostly seem to have issues with flights that transit through the US, which you can avoid.
Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by danudey on Monday January 30, 2017 @01:16AM (#13519066)
But the TSA requires airlines to list all passengers on flights travelling over US airspace, and can instruct an airline not to allow specific passengers onto that flight (or, presumably, not allow that airline to fly over its airspace).
Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by psybin on Monday January 30, 2017 @01:21AM (#13519081)
That seems grossly excessive.
Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by Canada on Monday January 30, 2017 @01:50AM (#13519150)
The TSA are just the goons who search passengers at the airport. They have nothing to do with what you've talking about.
Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by ganeshkrishnan on Monday January 30, 2017 @02:31AM (#13519281)
The TSA are not goons. They are just doing their job. If you have a problem with what they do, talk to their boss or vote for the right person.

Most of the TSA people I know are normal people and have families,kids and stressful job with passengers being aggressive at them for no fault of theirs.

Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by yummyfajitas on Monday January 30, 2017 @05:48AM (#13520022)
They're only following orders? I feel like I've heard that one before, I just can't remember when.

TSA employees are free to quit and find another job that doesn't involve fleecing the public to create security theatre, harassing people for no good reason, etc. They choose not to, and they are responsible for their choices.

Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by chopin on Monday January 30, 2017 @05:38AM (#13519974)
> They are just doing their job

The US does not regard this as a valid excuse. Cf. the Nuremberg trials.

Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by petercooper on Sunday January 29, 2017 @08:44PM (#13518051)
A few years ago I raised the idea (on Twitter) of Iceland being a nice "neutral" venue that's equally (in)convenient for both US and European attendees, very liberal and progressive, and, at the time, cheap for a Nordic country.

I have since seen a handful of industry conferences take place there, but it hasn't really blown up (one reason, I suspect, is it's reasonably expensive to stay there now - Iceland's decline did not last long!)

Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by deong on Monday January 30, 2017 @10:00AM (#13521658)
I've actually organized a machine learning conference in Iceland (AISTATS and MLSS 2014), and I can probably shed some light on this.

One, it's hideously expensive now, for almost anyone in the world. Second, it's incredibly small -- 320,000 people in the entire country, and maybe 220,000 of those in the Reykjavik area. Due to the "big fish in a small pond" aspect of Reykjavik being the capital, there's more infrastructure than you'd expect from a city of 200,000 people, but not that much more.

NIPS draws something like 3500 attendees now. I'm not sure there are 3500 hotel rooms in the country of Iceland. I struggled to find a venue that could host 10% of that for AISTATS. AISTATS is single-track which requires one big room, but there would have been very few options for finding a room big enough for just the deep learning breakaways at NIPS.

Aside from that, it's great. We did draw more people from the US than typical AISTATS European years had done, and it's a beautiful country for visitors to enjoy. But I don't think it's capable of becoming a major world conference center at the moment.

Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by petercooper on Monday January 30, 2017 @01:49PM (#13523900)
Fantastic response and insights. Thanks!
Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by xiaoma on Sunday January 29, 2017 @10:11PM (#13518367)
The next most important start-up hub after SF is Beijing. It's much more affordable than SF, but there are other concerns with hosting conferences there such as pollution, speech and media controls and a lot of regulation in general.

edit: I had no idea there was so much China hate here. I'm no fan of certain policies of the government, believe me. I hate the GFW with a passion. But the entrepreneurial community is incredible. There's a lot of skill at the high end and awe-inspiring levels of fearlessness and ambition.

Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by hueving on Monday January 30, 2017 @02:10AM (#13519204)
I've been to a conference in mainland China. The firewall made it completely miserable (it was a tech conference). People from the west expect to be able to use Google/gmail/hangouts/github/ssh for more than 5 minute random bursts of connectivity.

You can't expect people to go to tech conferences in those garbage conditions.

Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by patrickk on Monday January 30, 2017 @03:01AM (#13519370)
DevCon2? Lots of people on /r/ethereum were upset that videos of the talks were not available for weeks afterwards because it was in Shanghai.
Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by hueving on Monday January 30, 2017 @05:57AM (#13520067)
No, it was for developing infrastructure tooling (e.g. K8s, docker, etc), all of which was mainly hosted on github.

Sounds like it's not an uncommon problem. Frankly I think the conferences are only as successful as they are because of the volume of mainland Chinese citizens and the novelty of a trip to mainland China for people outside of the country.

Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by nrjdhsbsid on Monday January 30, 2017 @12:15AM (#13518880)
That would be great for conferences if it wasn't for everything you mentioned plus high levels of govt corruption and IP theft. The lack of open Internet alone is enough that the vast majority of conferences simply cannot be held there.

It's not "China hate" when there's legitimate reasons.

Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by stuckagain on Sunday January 29, 2017 @10:26PM (#13518420)
In what way is Beijing a legitimate counterpoint to an American lurch toward despotism?
Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by logical42 on Sunday January 29, 2017 @10:14PM (#13518381)
..like being able to use unfiltered internet?
Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by sharemywin on Sunday January 29, 2017 @10:20PM (#13518402)
pollution?
[dead]
Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by grzm on Monday January 30, 2017 @12:09AM (#13518847)
That only mods are 'dang and 'sctb. Are you referring to them? Or do you mean members who are downvoting? If the latter, please don't refer to them as mods.

And regardless, kindly don't resort to name calling.

Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by astrodust on Sunday January 29, 2017 @10:23PM (#13518412)
Like the 20+ hours of travel to get there?
Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by rahimnathwani on Sunday January 29, 2017 @10:58PM (#13518525)
From where does it take 20 hours to get to Beijing? SFO to Beijing is just over half that.
Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by astrodust on Monday January 30, 2017 @12:02AM (#13518819)
You're already on the Pacific coast. Not everyone on the planet is.

Under optimal circumstances, not including airport time which can be considerable, flight time between New York and Shanghai is 15 hours.

Add in a few hours to check-in, clear customs, plus other nonsense and you're up to 18. Under ideal circumstances.

Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by rahimnathwani on Monday January 30, 2017 @06:09PM (#13525953)
I'm not sure what Shanghai has to do with a discussion about travel time to Beijing. New York to Beijing is about 13-13.5 hours.

You claimed 20 hours. I'm asked 'from where' and you weren't able to answer.

I'm not suggesting Beijing is the ideal conference location, even though I live there, but there's no need to spread FUD about how it can take such a long time for a developer to reach there.

Oh, and it takes me the same time to get to SF as it takes an SF-based developer to get to Beijing. Hotels are cheaper in Beijing. Salaries are higher in SF.

Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by xiaoma on Monday January 30, 2017 @12:09AM (#13518845)
A lot more people on the planet live near Beijing than near Iceland.
Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by astrodust on Monday January 30, 2017 @12:12AM (#13518863)
If you're talking about India and China, sure.

If you're talking about America and Europe? Nope.

Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by xiaoma on Monday January 30, 2017 @01:09AM (#13519054)
Yes, India and China are indisputable giants but also consider Japan (still the #2 or #3 economy in the world depending on the metric), Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong and Singapore—all advanced economies with extremely educated and technical populaces.

Then there's Vietnam, which is very poor but growing over 10% / year and highly educated despite the poverty. There are also hundreds of millions of people in Indonesia and Malaysia.

I was speaking not of the US or Europe but the world in general. We don't live in the Eurocentric world of 150 years ago. The center of gravity now spans the Pacific.

Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by astrodust on Monday January 30, 2017 @01:18AM (#13519074)
It will. It does not right now if you're talking about conferences. Participants are still largely from the Americas and Europe.

Also this entire argument is utterly absurd. If you're upset about brutal domestic policies the last place you should be arguing in favor of is China.

Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by bjshepard on Monday January 30, 2017 @03:25AM (#13519454)
China has very sane, good government, come actually experience it and stop believing CIA lies. The firewall is a rational way to keep the US deep state out.
Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by astrodust on Monday January 30, 2017 @01:54PM (#13523948)
While I'll grant you Chinese government officials are probably more educated and experienced than your average American ones, there is no justifying the pervasive political censorship in China.

The CIA is not responsible for suppressing the Tiananmen Square incident. Stop spreading bullshit.

Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by labster on Sunday January 29, 2017 @10:54PM (#13518507)
While the idea of Iceland is great, being in the middle of the Atlantic. But this means that it's close to no one, including likely conference organizers.
Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by danaliv on Monday January 30, 2017 @03:08AM (#13519390)
Iceland is only a four-hour flight from Boston or Berlin. It's really quite a convenient location.
Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by widforss on Monday January 30, 2017 @03:35AM (#13519483)
While it is a great location, Iceland is not "cheap for a Nordic country" anymore. They picked up, and isolation does not come for free.
Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by thisrod on Monday January 30, 2017 @01:04AM (#13519035)
No one has mentioned Singapore yet. It's easier for most people to get there than to Australasia. And, in the scheme of hereditary fascist dictators, the Lees are comparatively sane ;-)
Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by mirimir on Sunday January 29, 2017 @10:45PM (#13518477)
Spain makes the most sense. Geographically, more or less. And economically too, I think.
Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by atomwaffel on Monday January 30, 2017 @03:09AM (#13519397)
I was thinking of Spain too. I went to a conference in Madrid last year and was pleasantly surprised by how many people there were from Spanish-speaking Latin America, far more than I usually see at conferences. At the same time, it's easy enough to get to for most of Europe and not too far from North America either.

Then again, I'm sure it's a nightmare for people from Oceania. Our planet is really inconvenient in that regard, what with being round and all…

Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by toomanybeersies on Monday January 30, 2017 @12:53AM (#13518997)
Unfortunately for me, being in New Zealand, Spain is literally as far away as you can get.
Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by mirimir on Monday January 30, 2017 @01:36AM (#13519113)
Sorry, I was thinking global weighted average.
Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by corford on Monday January 30, 2017 @09:23AM (#13521358)
Agree. Barcelona has huge hotel and conference infrastructure (plus easy to fly to directly from most places or connect via Madrid).
Re:Tripling Down Against USA Conference Hosting by astrodust on Sunday January 29, 2017 @10:22PM (#13518408)
It better fucking not be Dubai.