Re:Twitter discloses national security letters
by voxic11 on Friday January 27, 2017 @08:15PM
(#13504190)
He wants the Constitutional requirement, and the tradition of the separation of powers, to be fulfilled by having a Judge review and sign off on the search. That is all he wants, you are the one imagining insane things.
Re:Twitter discloses national security letters
by dgrealy on Friday January 27, 2017 @08:29PM
(#13504248)
How you are getting that I want anything different? Also, don't go around calling people insane.
Re:Twitter discloses national security letters
by Steko on Friday January 27, 2017 @09:41PM
(#13504536)
> How you are getting that I want anything different?
Then perhaps you're under the misunderstanding that a judge has signed off on the NSL's. That is not the case, these are warrantless searches.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_security_letter
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United...
Re:Twitter discloses national security letters
by dgrealy on Saturday January 28, 2017 @06:17PM
(#13510196)
Go ahead and downvote me, but NSA has a different process than warrants for a reason. There is signoff which satisfies the constitution. Secret court, secret panel. It is secret for a reason and the court is overseen by congress.
However personally I would prefer these cases to be declassified after a reasonalbe amount of time, where it is possible to protect the innocent.
I ask you with complete sincerity - think it through.