Re:Scribd’s HTML5 is a mess
by petercooper on Saturday May 15, 2010 @02:15PM
(#1350350)
He seems to be more peeved that it was promoted with the term "HTML 5." He has a point on that, if so. Do we want to see the term diluted to mean almost anything with a valid DOCTYPE, as Web 2.0 and AJAX were? Half the things on Delicious that are tagged AJAX are just basic Javascript..
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Scribd’s HTML5 is a mess
by armandososa on Saturday May 15, 2010 @02:27PM
(#1350375)
I think the problem is having the specification named "HTML5", if it has been named (as it was originally intended) "Web Applications 1.0" all this misunderstandings will go away.