Re:Avoid Non-Microsoft Antivirus Software
by majewsky on Thursday January 26, 2017 @07:34AM
(#13490800)
Do you have any evidence for these claims? What's the concrete mechanism that allows AVs to observe and react to threats earlier than Google? (Since you allow up to 1 week of reaction time, I'll assume that you're not referring to heuristic detection methods.)
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Avoid Non-Microsoft Antivirus Software
by ComodoHacker on Thursday January 26, 2017 @09:38AM
(#13491674)
With cloud reputation service all AV user base (provided sufficiently large) turn into global sensor network, along with honeypots vendors maintain separately. This allows (at the cost of users' privacy) to detect new emerging threats within hours, then acquire samples, analyze them and deploy new signatures within days.
Google can of course react equally fast. But "signal delay" may be much higher, as users report only URLs they can immediately link to their troubles, e.g. malware that crash browser.
And second, what Google can do now is to block only one attack vector, namely web page.
Thinking rationally, chances are high that Google is seriously considering to enter the AV business. They are in highly advantageous position to do it successfully, with their user base, resources and AI tech.
Re:Avoid Non-Microsoft Antivirus Software
by ltowel on Thursday January 26, 2017 @11:52AM
(#13492951)
Google owns VirusTotal, so they either alternatively have a strong set of tagged samples to work with, or an incentive to not disrupt their partnerships with exiting vendors.
Re:Avoid Non-Microsoft Antivirus Software
by ComodoHacker on Thursday January 26, 2017 @07:11PM
(#13496640)
Good point. A huge, high quality dataset to train their own AI-based malware detection engine. Someone must be doing this already, at least as a research project.