mJS – A new approach to embedded scripting

Re:mJS – A new approach to embedded scripting by _pmf_ on Wednesday January 25, 2017 @03:33PM (#13485731)

As light weight, easily embeddable JS engines go, I'd like to mention Duktape[0]. But the FFI of mJS does look quite a bit nicer.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:mJS – A new approach to embedded scripting by drozd on Wednesday January 25, 2017 @05:19PM (#13486784)

Duktape is nice, and I've mentioned it in the article. However it's quite fat, and can't be used on some boards like ESP8266. It's flash footprint is Megabytes, whereas mJS flash footprint is ~25k.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:mJS – A new approach to embedded scripting by megous on Wednesday January 25, 2017 @06:41PM (#13487342)

Duktape website:

"Embeddable, portable, compact: can run on platforms with 192kB flash and 64kB system RAM"

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:mJS – A new approach to embedded scripting by ricardobeat on Wednesday January 25, 2017 @07:25PM (#13487588)

Also http://www.esp32.com/viewtopic.php?t=497

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:mJS – A new approach to embedded scripting by drozd on Wednesday January 25, 2017 @07:43PM (#13487734)

Ah, thanks, wrong about flash footprint. Neil has done a great job adopting Duktape on ESP32.

[ Parent | on HN ]