Scientists must fight for the facts

Re:Scientists must fight for the facts by trombone22 on Wednesday January 25, 2017 @07:55AM (#13480991)

That his energy plan does not mention the threat of climate change is another fact, that the energy plan does not mention nuclear power, that of two scientists he has met after the election one is well known for his active denial of the central discovery of climate science: these are more facts the article relays.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Scientists must fight for the facts by return0 on Wednesday January 25, 2017 @08:17AM (#13481141)

Then the author should be more honest. "We must fight to add nuclear power to trump's plan". That other 'fact' is inconsequential.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Scientists must fight for the facts by 08-15 on Wednesday January 25, 2017 @03:31PM (#13485711)

> these are more facts the article relays

So it's a bad article, aka a political fluff piece. I got that message from reading it.

But what are these facts?

[ Parent | on HN ]