Re:George Orwell’s 1984 is currently the top selling book on...
by baddox on Wednesday January 25, 2017 @07:38AM
(#13480890)
I still don't get it. Why would sparsely populated states' interests be underrepresented if every individual vote were equal? That only makes sense if you think land area or population density is a primary unit of relevance regarding political influence, which to me seems completely arbitrary.
Re:George Orwell’s 1984 is currently the top selling book on...
by rbanffy on Wednesday January 25, 2017 @04:32PM
(#13486381)
People who live in underpopulated states have a valid argument in that, if their votes are not weighted to compensate for the low density, their voices may end up not being heard. This weighting creates a minimum limit for representation.
It, however, removes the penalty for suppressing votes because the remaining votes continue to have a fixed weight.
Unfortunately, there is no mechanism in place that actively punishes voter suppression. Voters per inhabitant ratio and election turnout could be used to penalize states with low engagement to ensure voter suppression does not occur.