News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:George Orwell’s 1984 is currently the top selling book on... by rbanffy on Wednesday January 25, 2017 @07:13AM (#13480769)
It exists because some states are very sparsely populated while others actively suppress the votes of a large portion of its population, first by slavery, then by other methods. It's fair to increase representation of underpopulated states because their interests would be underrepresented if not (and it's a good thing because it allows large areas to be dedicated to nature).

Unfortunately, there is no mechanism in place that actively punishes voter suppression. Voters per inhabitant ratio and election turnout could be used to penalize states with low engagement to ensure voter suppression does not occur.

Re:George Orwell’s 1984 is currently the top selling book on... by baddox on Wednesday January 25, 2017 @07:38AM (#13480890)
I still don't get it. Why would sparsely populated states' interests be underrepresented if every individual vote were equal? That only makes sense if you think land area or population density is a primary unit of relevance regarding political influence, which to me seems completely arbitrary.
Re:George Orwell’s 1984 is currently the top selling book on... by rbanffy on Wednesday January 25, 2017 @04:32PM (#13486381)
People who live in underpopulated states have a valid argument in that, if their votes are not weighted to compensate for the low density, their voices may end up not being heard. This weighting creates a minimum limit for representation.

It, however, removes the penalty for suppressing votes because the remaining votes continue to have a fixed weight.

Re:George Orwell’s 1984 is currently the top selling book on... by dllthomas on Wednesday January 25, 2017 @10:28AM (#13482131)
One sq mile, one vote!