Re:What's all this fuss about Erlang? (2007)
by molloy on Tuesday January 24, 2017 @06:54PM
(#13477013)
> I've yet to find a language that can communicate between threads as performant-ly.
Minor nitpick: Erlang uses processes, not threads. Your comment doesn't explicitly say that Erlang uses threads though, so perhaps I'm being overly pedantic.
Minor nitpick: Erlang uses processes, not threads. Your comment doesn't explicitly say that Erlang uses threads though, so perhaps I'm being overly pedantic.