News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The struggle with Rust by kibwen on Tuesday January 24, 2017 @12:27PM (#13473412)
And I think that's fine; Rust isn't trying to be the one language to rule them all. It's intended as a foundational language: your friend's streaming website survives despite his own code crashing often, but it won't survive if his off-the-shelf HTTP server crashes often (HTTP servers being the sort of thing one would write in Rust). Likewise, your mathematicians aren't going to be very productive if their Python interpreter crashes often (likewise, interpreters are the sort of thing one would also imagine writing in Rust).

Even in Rust's ideal future, very little of the code atop the stack is written in it. It's the code at the very bottom that underpins everything whose share it hopes to eat.

Re:The struggle with Rust by sh_tinh_hair on Tuesday January 24, 2017 @01:30PM (#13474074)
Dictatorial concepts in PL usually fail pretty badly. Rust may become the textbook example of a good idea too far. I'd certainly never use it or use anything written in it given a choice and/or time to rewrite in anything more accessible.
Re:The struggle with Rust by kibwen on Tuesday January 24, 2017 @03:24PM (#13475109)
> or use anything written in it

As I often say on HN, I must be missing the sarcasm here...

Re:The struggle with Rust by webmaven on Tuesday January 24, 2017 @04:08PM (#13475461)
I think "use" in this case is in the sense of a developer using code, rather than an end-user application.
Re:The struggle with Rust by sametmax on Wednesday January 25, 2017 @06:39AM (#13480582)
Oh yeah that's fine. Both languages are actually very nice used together.