The US’s Stance on Surveillance Needs a Hard Reset

Re:The US’s Stance on Surveillance Needs a Hard Reset by mc32 on Sunday January 22, 2017 @09:54PM (#13459350)

Many people in the press conflate border control with xenophobia and anti-immigrant sentiment. I didn't vote for the guy but my take is he isn't looking to kerb legal immigration (with the exception of people form "terrorist hotbeds") so much as require all immigrants to get the proper visa as well as get expelled if they overstay a visa --normal operating procedure for most mature governments.

I can understand the preoccupation that he might especially kerb people from the ME. However I see this constant conflation seemingly to scare all immigrants into thinking that the new administration is "anti-immigrant" whereas I see it as anti-illegal/undocumented immigration.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The US’s Stance on Surveillance Needs a Hard Reset by many_bells_down on Sunday January 22, 2017 @10:19PM (#13459479)

This conflation creates division. The same occurs with a myriad of other issues. Someone could have supported Trump at the inauguration on Friday, marched in support of women's rights on Saturday, and been entirely consistent in the views they were espousing. However, a common viewpoint is that these are somehow mutually exclusive when in fact they are far from it.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The US’s Stance on Surveillance Needs a Hard Reset by mc32 on Sunday January 22, 2017 @10:25PM (#13459516)

Exactly. Many people were/are surprised by the large proportion of [white] women who voted for Trump and some people continue to think that only misogynists could have voted for Trump.

It's clear many people are _trying_ to sew division where none exists in order to advance an agenda [in the immigration case there are people who because they favor unregulated immigration do purposely conflate things in order to raise concern with legal immigrants --people completely unaffected by any new immigration laws]

[ Parent | on HN ]