Putting those aside, from a purely logical perspective, someone has to have kids or the human race won't last much longer.
> problem solved.
Keeping it a flat rate also incentivizes wealthier (and thus on average higher educated) people to have more children.
https://www.melbourneinstitute.com/downloads/media_release/f...
> “Our analysis of mothers’ intentions to have a child, and an examination of reported births statistics, suggested that the baby bonus increased the fertility rate by 3.2 per cent”, said co-author of the study, Mark Wooden Professorial Research Fellow and Deputy Director, Melbourne Institute.
I thought that it was well known that economic considerations such as career, daycare costs & even how many children does the car fit affect family size.
SF kid raising wasn't ideal, and when we realized what would be involved w/r/t schooling, we left.
I have a very very tiny tiny inkling of how difficult, after spending several weeks with my sister, her husband, and their (now) 8-month-old. And I know that what I see and feel is only a tiny fraction of what they see and feel. It's the best shot of birth control I could ever get.
And yet, parents -- on the whole -- love their kids, would do anything for them, and believe that their decision to have kids was the correct one. Holy biological imperatives, Batman.
I really hate that there are so few kids in SF. I wish SF could be a more kid- and family-friendly city. It just seems like too many things need to be fixed to make that happen in any reasonable time frame, and it's tempting to suggest that other things -- such as the housing crisis -- are more pressing and deserving of people's time and attention.