Re:Uber Hires Former Google Search Chief Amit Singhal as SVP...
by alpb on Friday January 20, 2017 @11:37PM
(#13448830)
I wonder how come Lyft can do these things and Uber can't. This is from 2 years ago: https://thehub.lyft.com/blog/2015/01/14/partners-ehealth-top... Every Uber driver I talk to in Seattle say that Lyft is way better in terms of pay/perks but they can't get enough rides because Uber simply has a larger user base.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Uber Hires Former Google Search Chief Amit Singhal as SVP...
by qq66 on Saturday January 21, 2017 @04:00AM
(#13449430)
Lyft is more expensive, which explains its better pay and its smaller ridership. I don't think this is sustainable because of what you've observed, which is that the smaller ridership pushes drivers away from the platform, making Lyft less appealing to even the people willing to pay (longer wait times, smaller chance of getting a carpool, etc).
Re:Uber Hires Former Google Search Chief Amit Singhal as SVP...
by schnable on Saturday January 21, 2017 @09:55AM
(#13450252)
I think it depends on the market. Lyft here (Philadelphia) is the same price as Uber just about, and they both run promotions all the time. Car availability is the same in my experience and most drivers seem to do both. Drivers seem to indicate that they get better subsidies to drive from Lyft.
Re:Uber Hires Former Google Search Chief Amit Singhal as SVP...
by argonaut on Saturday January 21, 2017 @02:30AM
(#13449266)
I'll admit that lately I've been mostly taking Uber because it's cheaper than Lyft. So that probably explains it - Lyft simply doesn't cut prices as aggressively. (But I still check both because sometimes Lyft is cheaper).