News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Uber Hires Former Google Search Chief Amit Singhal as SVP... by Eridrus on Friday January 20, 2017 @07:27PM (#13448069)
I think there are real economies of scale in ride service. Once you have enough customers your cars are better utilised and your costs are lower, this means that while Uber's cap table may be all fucked up by the time it happens, it will lose less money competing on price than new entrants.

Depending on how large these economies of scale are, even the fact that a new entrants would be doing less volume (and therefore losing more) may not be enough to help them compete.

Re:Uber Hires Former Google Search Chief Amit Singhal as SVP... by ctrl_freak on Friday January 20, 2017 @07:43PM (#13448129)
This analysis strongly suggests that there isn't economies of scale in ride service:

http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2016/11/can-uber-ever-deliver...

Re:Uber Hires Former Google Search Chief Amit Singhal as SVP... by Eridrus on Friday January 20, 2017 @09:19PM (#13448404)
I agree that there are no economies of scale that cause one operator to have an advantage expanding to other cities.

However, in a given city, I would expect there to be economies of scale as you optimize your cars better and decrease the amount of time they have no passengers. It's most clear to me in the case of UberPOOL where the more passengers you have in total, the more likely two of them will be going in the same direction. We may not have reached a cheap enough price point yet to hit these economies.

Depending on how much you trust anything Uber says, they say they are profitable in SF, and some other US metros, which the article you linked ignores.

I think people are right to be a little skeptical, given how loose Uber is with the truth, but I see a possibility for them to succeed and smart people keep giving them good money so I want to give them the benefit of the doubt on the issue of actually making money eventually.