Show HN: Phorth – A Forth-like language on the Python VM

Re:Show HN: Phorth – A Forth-like language on the Python VM by sdegutis on Friday January 20, 2017 @04:28PM (#13447105)

Pixie (kind of Lisp) mentioned a few days ago was built on RPython, and Hy (similar kind of Lisp) is built on Python's VM.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Show HN: Phorth – A Forth-like language on the Python VM by sabauma on Friday January 20, 2017 @04:43PM (#13447204)

While Pixie is implemented in RPython, Pixie code does not run on the Python VM. You can run the Pixie _interpreter_ in the Python VM, since it is valid Python code, but that is markedly different than compiling a language to Python bytecodes.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Show HN: Phorth – A Forth-like language on the Python VM by nerdponx on Saturday January 21, 2017 @06:45PM (#13452761)

What does Pixie itself actually run on then?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Show HN: Phorth – A Forth-like language on the Python VM by sabauma on Wednesday January 25, 2017 @03:18PM (#13485594)

That depends on how you run Pixie. There are 2 possible cases.

1. Run Pixie atop the Python VM: this is quite slow as there are 2 levels of interpretation. This is mostly used for testing.

2. As a standalone binary: The RPython language includes a translator which targets C. The generated code is reasonably fast (I think the PyPy interpreter without the JIT is within a factor of 2 the CPython VM). The translator is also responsible for generating the JIT compiler for your interpreter, so a well written interpreter can indeed be quite fast, post translation.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Show HN: Phorth – A Forth-like language on the Python VM by didibus on Saturday January 21, 2017 @03:38AM (#13449387)

Well Hy is just an alternate syntax, wouldn't really call it another language as the semantics are the same.

[ Parent | on HN ]