Re:Channels in Common Lisp
by wtbob on Friday January 20, 2017 @10:13AM
(#13444329)
I guess I should have mentioned that Lisp is my language of choice. I like the ease with which I can implement anything. But it does have a cost: everyone else implements everything himself, too.
I actually think Quicklisp has helped. It's even easier to do (ql:quickload "foo-lib") than it is to write my own foo library.
Re:Channels in Common Lisp
by nickik on Friday January 20, 2017 @06:37PM
(#13447844)
Everybody can do that stuff in Clojure too, and it does not suffer from the same thing CL does. It seems to me that it is a culture/ecosystem problem more then anything else.
I actually think Quicklisp has helped. It's even easier to do (ql:quickload "foo-lib") than it is to write my own foo library.