I disagree.

Being wrong should never justify exclusion. Being wrong gets argument, not punishment.

Parent does not harass women? Parent gets to stay. Otherwise you show you can't be trusted with the power to kick people out.

Parent did just harass women. But other than that I agree with you.

Stuff like this is what makes people not trust SJ people.

Parent did not send women sexual messages. Parent did not stalk people. Parent did not photoshop girls with blood.

Parent had an opinion on the internet. If we can't even tolerate that, how can we be trusted to decide who stays and who goes?

(Note: if parent did any of the above, I retract my claim.)